|
©
1999-2001 STAT America
All Rights Reserved
|
|
The
following case study was published by Working Partners of the United States
Department of Labor:
|
|
The
retail industry is a "total exposure" employer. Its sales force
handles customers, products, and cash. Human resource issues are significant
in the retail trade, and they are becoming even more so: the greatest
employment gains have been in the retail and services industries.1
|
|
|
The
retail industry is made up largely of small companies. Unfortunately,
small companies are particularly vulnerable to workers who abuse alcohol
and other drugs. A recent government survey indicated that 71 percent
of illegal drug users are employed; 260 percent are with companies that
employ 500 or fewer workers.3
|
|
|
Small
businesses may be particularly vulnerable to problems of drug abuse among
their employees because drug abusers will seek work at smaller firms where
the likelihood of drug testing is slim.4 |
|
|
The
retail industry traditionally draws heavily from the pool of 18- to 34-year-old
job seekers, a segment of the American population that is at the heart
of a nationwide increase in illegal drug use. Among young adults age 18-20,
18 percent are current illicit drug users; 12 percent of those age 21-
25 and 8 percent of those age 26-34 are also current drug users.5
|
|
|
The
future work force is also at risk for alcohol and other drug abuse. Substance
abuse among American teens is increasing at an alarming rateóup 33 percent
in the past year; up 78 percent in the past three years.6
|
|
|
In
the retail industry, approximately 11 percent of full-time employees admit
to using illegal drugs within the past 30 days. Nearly 20 percent indicate
that they have used illegal drugs sometime during the past year and almost
9 percent admit to heavy alcohol use.7
|
|
|
Employees
in specific retail industries reported the use of alcohol and other drugs
at the following levels:8
|
| |
Illegal
Drugs
|
Alcohol
|
| |
Current
Use (%)
|
Past
Year Use (%)
|
Heavy
Use (%)
|
|
Apparel
& Shoe Stores
|
3.9
|
12.3
|
1.5
|
|
Auto
Supply & Gas Stations
|
11.2
|
22.2
|
13.2
|
|
Department
Stores
|
5.7
|
13.1
|
3.5
|
|
Eating
& Drinking Places
|
16.3
|
28.0
|
15.4
|
|
Furniture
& Appliances
|
14.4
|
20.2
|
6.2
|
|
Grocery
Stores
|
9.3
|
17.2
|
5.8
|
|
Motor
Vehicle Dealers
|
9.3
|
17.4
|
8.7
|
|
Other
Retail Stores
|
5.9
|
12.8
|
4.7
|
|
|
Substance
abusers do not make good employees. A study conducted by the U.S. Postal
Service of workers who had tested positive in pre-employment tests, but
were hired anyway, revealed the following: |
|
|
- nearly
70 percent were involuntarily discharged in less than two-and-a-half
years;
- almost
60 percent were more likely to be heavy users of leave; and
- by
the 33rd month, those testing positive were absent about 66 percent
more often than those who had tested negative.9
|
|
|
Many
small retail businesses have looked closely at the cost of substance abuse
in their workplaces versus the cost of setting up a prevention program.
A partner in a Los Angeles law firm told dealers at a National Automotive
Dealers Association conference, "You have a choice; You obviously
don't need to [put a drug policy in place]. The question is, what are
the costs for a company not having a policy? If you put a dollar figure
on what it costs you in terms of one workers' compensation injury, that
could be worth about $40,000.10 |
|
|
Some
sectors of the food service industry have experienced the benefits of
workplace substance abuse programs. According to a survey of 400 Hardee's
fast-food establishments, 23 percent said they had initiated substance
abuse prevention programs. Of those, 57 percent reported a positive financial
impact, including reduced employee turnover and absenteeism.11
|
|
|
From
large international corporations to relatively small establishments, more
and more retail companies are implementing and maintaining substance abuse
programs to ensure that their work forces are productive, their workplaces
are safe, and the success of their businesses are not hindered by substance
abuse.
|
Endnotes:
1
SBA Report to the President, 1994.
21995
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health & Human
Services, 1996.
3
Drug Strategies, Washington, D.C., 1996.
4"Mangan,
D. "An Rx for Drug Abuse." Small Business Reports 17, no. 5 (May
1993):1,32.
5
1995 National Household Survey, 1996.
6Ibid.
7"Drug
Use Among U.S. Workers: Prevalence and Trends By Occupation and Industry Categories,"
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 1996.
8Ibid.
9"An
Empirical Evaluation of Pre-Employment Drug Testing in the United States Postal
Service: Interim Report on Findings," Drugs in the Workplace: Research
and Evaluation Data. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1989.
10
"Mooney, M. "Drugs in the Workplace." Automotive Executive
(September 1991): 27-28.
11Boddie-Noell
Enterprises. "Just Say No" Survey. Rocky Mount, North Carolina,
1990.
|